Posts

Showing posts with the label manual test

Mobile Accessibility Test per US Dept of Labor

https://github.com/USDepartmentofLabor/Mobile-Accessibility-Test-Script/blob/master/QA%20Test%20Cases.md These tests are based on  Best Practices by SSB BART Group  and on Level A and Level AA Success Criteria of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, W3C Recommendation, 11 December 2008,  http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ , as proposed by the U.S. Access Board,  http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/draft-rule.htm.This  checklist is inclusive of the Technical Standards of Subpart B of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794d),  http://section508.gov/index.cfm?fuseAction=stdsdoc . https://code.gov/projects/dol_opa_1_mobile_accessibility_test_script

Manual vs Automated Testing Review from article by Forbes Tech Council

Manual Testing  article review from Forbes: Keep Calm And Continue Testing: Nine Reasons Manual Testing Will Always Be In Demand POST WRITTEN BY Ruslan Desyatnikov Software Test Optimization Review: 25 years ago, aka pre-Y2K, a majority of testing was manual and automated testing was to me was in its infancy.  Yes, automated testing has been around since the 70s , but it was not the norm.  Today automation should be the norm and should be a majority of your test cases and test resources, but as this article states manual testing is still needed and should be at a minimum 10-20% of your test COVERAGE.  Validation or acceptance testing, as well as verification of the highest value and risk functional coverage, should have manual coverage.