Manual vs Automated Testing Review from article by Forbes Tech Council

Manual Testing article review from Forbes:

Keep Calm And Continue Testing: Nine Reasons Manual Testing Will Always Be In Demand POST WRITTEN BY

Ruslan Desyatnikov

Software Test Optimization Review:
25 years ago, aka pre-Y2K, a majority of testing was manual and automated testing was to me was in its infancy.  Yes, automated testing has been around since the 70s, but it was not the norm.  Today automation should be the norm and should be a majority of your test cases and test resources, but as this article states manual testing is still needed and should be at a minimum 10-20% of your test COVERAGE.  Validation or acceptance testing, as well as verification of the highest value and risk functional coverage, should have manual coverage.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Don't Let This Be YOU: Mazda bricks Radios with Software Defect

Image
 ARS Technica article on Mazda radio defect by  JONATHAN M. GITLIN  -  2/9/2022 SummARY: A critical real-time defect in Mazda radios was triggered by a Seattle radio station.  If you were unfortunate enough to have this  2014 to 2017  Mazda radio and live in the Seattle area listening to  94.9 FM , the radio was no longer usable.  Files with no extension were (like .jpg) were the use case that sent the radio into constant reboot condition rendering it useless.  Read the full article at link above.  Yes, I was slow to find this gem.  Please share if you find more like it!
Read more

F35 System Testing

Image
Many calendar years of development and testing have gone into one of the most complex vehicle systems ever -  the F-35. This article details how performance and  End User / Operational Testing of F-35  is being performed.
Read more